Describe the software and the buyer
Explain what the product does, who signs the contract, and whether you sell to individuals, teams, or the enterprise. The buyer shapes how serious the name must sound.
Turn a B2B software brief into a shortlist that reads as credible to a buyer and survives moving upmarket. Each name comes with a candid critique and live domain availability across the endings software buyers expect.
You get six checked names by default—each weighed for buyer trust, category distinctiveness, and domain reality—and can steer more serious, more technical, or more premium from there.
Explain what the product does, who signs the contract, and whether you sell to individuals, teams, or the enterprise. The buyer shapes how serious the name must sound.
Decide how much a .com matters versus .io or .ai for your buyer, and set the endings to check before spending tokens on checked names.
Weigh trust, distinctiveness from the category's sound-alikes, upmarket durability, and live availability, then refine conversationally.
Serious, coinable, and enterprise-safe with a clean spelling; distinct enough to escape the sea of '-ic' and 'Bolt-' names in software.
Communicates the finance category instantly, but the '-ly' ending sounds like a dozen competitors and the meaning boxes you in if you expand.
Solid and infrastructural, fitting for a technical buyer, though 'grid' is well-worn and the compound takes a beat to parse when spoken.
Confident and modern for a self-serve audience, but the hype tone can undercut trust when you move upmarket to cautious enterprise buyers.
Illustrative sample. Live runs check domain availability in real time and critique names against your actual brief.
B2B buyers put a name on a contract and a security review. It should sound like a company that will still be answering support tickets next year.
Whole software categories converge on the same sounds. A name that blends into the 'Boltic' crowd is harder to recall and to differentiate in a demo.
Software buyers tolerate .io and .ai more than most audiences, but a serious enterprise sale can still expect the .com. The critique weighs your buyer.
A playful self-serve name can feel wrong in front of a procurement team. The critique flags names that will strain as the deal size grows.
Names get dictated on sales calls and typed into address bars. Ambiguous spellings and invented compounds add friction at exactly the wrong moments.
SaaS products expand into platforms. A name tied to one feature can undersell the suite you intend to become.
B2B software is bought differently from a consumer app. The name appears in a procurement process, a security questionnaire, and a renewal conversation, often in front of people who were not in the room when the deal started. It has to signal that the company is stable, competent, and likely to still exist at renewal—so tone and credibility carry more weight than cleverness.
That does not mean bland. The strongest SaaS names are distinctive enough to remember after a crowded demo day, yet serious enough to sit on an enterprise invoice. The consultant weighs those two pulls against each other rather than optimizing for one, because a name that is only safe is as much a liability as one that is only fun.
Software categories drift toward a shared phonetic palette—clipped tech syllables, the same suffixes, the same 'everything sounds like Boltic' feel. When your name lands in that cluster, buyers struggle to tell you apart, sales reps mishear it on calls, and search results blur you with competitors. Distinctiveness is not vanity here; it is what makes the name usable.
The fix is rarely to be louder. It is to pick a name with its own shape—an unexpected but pronounceable coinage, a real word used sideways, a sound the category has not worn out. The consultant checks candidates against how crowded their construction feels and flags the ones that will disappear into the herd.
Software buyers accept .io and .ai more readily than most audiences, which widens your options when the .com is taken. But an enterprise-facing brand still benefits from a credible .com, and the gap between a first-year promotional price and the long-term renewal can be large. The consultant checks the endings your buyer expects and shows first-year versus renewal pricing when it is available.
Availability is a live snapshot, not a reservation, and it says nothing about trademarks. Software names collide across the category more often than founders expect, so search company registers, existing products, and the relevant trademark classes before committing, and confirm the domain and its renewal terms with the registrar.
A standard generation returns six checked names, each with a critique and live domain availability. You can change the count and keep refining—more serious, more technical, more premium—in the conversation.
Yes. The endings you select, commonly .com alongside .io or .ai, are checked against live domain-data sources at generation time. The result is a snapshot and does not reserve the domain.
Often yes—software buyers tolerate them more than most audiences. But an enterprise sale can still expect a .com, so the consultant weighs the ending against who signs your contracts.
Describe your category and the consultant flags names that fall into its crowded sound-alike pattern, steering toward constructions distinct enough to recall after a demo.
Say how far upmarket you intend to sell. The critique flags names whose tone is too casual to survive a procurement team or too narrow to cover an expanding platform.
No. It can flag obvious conflicts, but it is not legal clearance. Search the relevant trademark registers and existing products, and take professional advice before adopting the name.
Generate or assess names, check the relevant domains, and keep refining until the choice holds up.
Open the naming consultant →