Describe the app
Say what the app does, who opens it, and how often. Note whether the app name and the company name need to be the same thing.
Turn what your app does into a short, one-word-feeling name people can find in the store and type without thinking. Each suggestion comes with a candid critique and live domain availability.
You get six checked names by default—each tested for how it reads as an icon label, an app-store result, and a domain—and can steer shorter, softer, or more playful from there.
Say what the app does, who opens it, and how often. Note whether the app name and the company name need to be the same thing.
Confirm the domain endings worth checking for your markets—often .com plus .app or .co—before any checked-name tokens are spent.
Weigh how each name looks under an icon, ranks in store search, and whether a matching handle and domain are open, then refine.
Warm, memorable, and easy to say, with a friendly icon label; the trade-off is that a real word is harder to own in store search.
Compact and app-native, but the dropped vowel means every install and support email will involve spelling it out.
Clear about what it is, but two words crowd the icon label and 'Loop' is heavily used, so store search will be competitive.
Short, distinctive, and cleanly pronounced with an open handle; check it carries no awkward meaning in your launch languages.
Illustrative sample. Live runs check domain availability in real time and critique names against your actual brief.
An app name sits under a small icon and inside a narrow store field. Short names look intentional there; long or two-word names get truncated.
A common word competes with everything else using it. A distinctive coinage is easier to rank for and to find when someone searches it by name.
The app and the company do not have to share a name. The critique notes when a single name serves both and when a product name reads better.
A name is easier to market when the social handle and a credible domain are both obtainable, not just the domain alone.
People hear app names in recommendations and ads. Ambiguous spellings, dropped vowels, and homophones cost you installs at the search step.
An app named for one feature struggles when it grows into a suite. A slightly broader name leaves room for the next screen.
An app name lives in tighter spaces than most brand names: a label under a small icon, a truncated field in store search, a spoken recommendation from a friend. That environment rewards short, single-word-feeling names with clean pronunciation, and punishes two-word constructions that get cut off or lost among identical results.
It also has to be found. When someone hears your app's name and types it into the store, an ambiguous spelling or a common dictionary word can bury you under unrelated results. The consultant weighs how each candidate behaves as an icon label and a search term, not just whether it sounds nice in isolation.
Sometimes one name should do both jobs, and sometimes separating them is stronger. A single flagship app often shares its name with the company for simplicity. But if you expect a portfolio, the company can carry a broader parent name while each app takes a product name that describes or evokes its specific job.
This matters for domains and handles too. A shared name concentrates your effort on one domain and one handle; separate names mean securing both. Describe whether this is your one app or the first of several, and the critique will weigh the app name and the company name accordingly.
For an app, a matching social handle can matter as much as the domain, because much of the discovery happens through recommendations and stores rather than a typed URL. The consultant checks the domain endings that fit your markets—commonly .com alongside .app or .co—and shows availability so you can see where the name is clear before committing.
Availability is a live snapshot, not a reservation, and a free domain is not trademark clearance. Search the app stores, social platforms, and the relevant trademark registers before you build a listing around the name, and confirm the domain and its renewal price with the registrar.
A standard generation returns six checked names, each with a critique and live domain availability. You can change the count and keep refining—shorter, softer, more playful—in the conversation.
Yes. The selected endings, typically including .com and .app, are checked against live domain-data sources at generation time. The result is a snapshot and does not reserve the domain.
Not necessarily. A single flagship app often shares the company name, while a planned portfolio usually pairs a broad company name with distinct product names. Say which you expect and the critique adjusts.
It flags names likely to collide with common words or existing apps, which are harder to rank for and find. It does not access store ranking data, so treat it as naming judgment, not an ASO audit.
The consultant focuses on live domain availability. It can discuss whether a matching handle is likely obtainable, but you should confirm handles directly on each platform.
No. It can flag obvious risks, but it is not legal clearance. Search the app stores and the relevant trademark registers, and take professional advice before you launch.
Generate or assess names, check the relevant domains, and keep refining until the choice holds up.
Open the naming consultant →